Peyton Stearns vs Amanda Anisimova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the second serve performance over the last six months reveals that Amanda Anisimova has a slight edge by winning 39.83% of her points compared to Peyton Stearns' 39.72%. This subtle difference can be crucial for match outcomes and predictions. Indeed, this correlation underscores the minor yet potentially pivotal advantage that Anisimova holds in this aspect of their game.

Examining return game statistics, it becomes evident that Stearns surpasses Anisimova in returning her opponent's second serve points, registering a remarkable 51.97% against Anisimova's 47.22%. Conversely, when evaluating first-serve returns, Anisimova leads with 33.41%, slightly ahead of Stearns' 32.06%. These figures can greatly influence who is favored in head-to-head matches.

Considering pressure situations, Stearns has demonstrated superior breakpoint resilience in recent form, saving 51.64% of breakpoints faced, compared to Anisimova's 50.79%. This statistic is especially valuable for predicting critical moments in matches. Additionally, Anisimova has converted 32.33% of her breakpoint opportunities, whereas Stearns has managed to convert a higher percentage at 38.89%. Such metrics are invaluable for in-game betting scenarios.

In terms of overall match performance over the past year, Anisimova boasts a higher win percentage, ahead with 66.67% (W/L 30/15) compared to Stearns' 57.41% (W/L 31/23). This head-to-head comparison provides a comprehensive overview of their recent exploits on the court.

Assessing their favored playing surfaces reveals that Anisimova commands a substantial win percentage on clay courts, achieving 65% (W/L 51/27), while her weakest surface is indoor hard courts at 50% (W/L 2/2). On the other hand, Stearns excels on indoor hard courts with a 68% win rate (W/L 15/7) and struggles more on grass, with a win percentage of 33% (W/L 2/4).

Regarding competition level, Anisimova has predominantly competed on the Masters series over the past year, winning 72.73% of her encounters (W/L 16/6), whereas Stearns has primarily participated in the Main tour, securing 56.52% (W/L 13/10). Evaluating these statistics relative to event level is essential when forecasting favorites in a match.

Opponent quality offers another perspective; Anisimova has faced adversaries with an average rank of 68.78 over the last 12 months, compared to Stearns' opponents, averaging a rank of 108.24. This statistic indicates that Anisimova has generally competed against more highly-ranked competitors.

Regarding deciding sets, Stearns has a notable advantage, having triumphed in 61% of her deciding sets in matches over the past year, while Anisimova has only won 43%. This factor could play a crucial role should the match extend to a decisive set.

Based on the meticulous examination of these statistics, Stearns appears to be favored in this matchup due to her superior breakpoint conversion and deciding set performance, coupled with a strong return game. However, Anisimova's consistency against higher-ranked players and overall winning percentage cannot be ignored, suggesting a closely fought encounter ahead.